A judge invalidated New York City’s ban on large sugary drinks on Monday, one day before it was to go into effect, dealing Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg a major blow.
The decision by Justice Milton A. Tingling Jr. of State Supreme Court in Manhattan blocks the city from putting the rules into effect or enforcing them.
Well, it looks like the first point goes to Starbucks after all. The Bloomberg administration has already announced that it will challenge Judge Tingling’s decision; however, it doesn’t look like the planned 16-ounce restriction will be taking effect on Tuesday after all.
In the fall of 2012, the big story around sugary drinks in California was a proposed soda tax (also backed by actor Danny Glover). The sugar-sweetened beverage tax faced votes in El Monte and Richmond, where the beverage industry spent nearly $2.5 million to stop the measure.
Researchers from UC San Francisco, Columbia University and Oregon State University also found that:
A tax on soda would carry the greatest health benefits for black and Latino Californians, who face the highest risks of diabetes and heart disease, according to recent research findings.
If a penny-per-ounce tax was applied to soda, cuts in consumption would result in an 8 percent decline in diabetes cases among blacks and Latinos.
Read more…



![Election Day brings out the love of data and numbers in all of us. As reporters around the state and country dig into voter returns and look for clues to the final tally, we thought we’d highlight these interesting California voter facts [PDF] recently released by Debra Bowen, California’s secretary of state.](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_md3gasIZgV1qisi4ao1_500.jpg)





